For San Francisco’s judicial candidates, this spring is proving to be one heck of an expensive job interview.
Both have spent in the neighborhood of $100,000 — or more — so far. And both have reached into their own pockets for substantial money to finance their campaigns; local attorney Eric Safire has loaned his campaign $75,000, while retired judge Lillian Sing has loaned herself $45,000.
She’s done the best when it comes to raising hard, cold cash — from other people — bringing in $76,249 to Safire’s $47,932 between March 18 and May 20, according to recently filed campaign finance reports. (Safire may have made up for some of that discrepancy in spending power, though, with $40,057 in other kinds of contributions, like donated party space and food, compared to $1,420 for Sing.)
Sing got more cash, though, by bringing in more four-figure checks, from generous givers that include local retirees and business people, as well as attorneys such as local lawyer Leanna Dawydiak ($1,320), and Cotchett, Pitre, Simon & McCarthy partners Joseph Cotchett ($2,500) and Bruce Simon ($1,000). As expected, Sing also got some help from several of her fellow colleagues on the bench, though none of them even matched the generosity of Judge A. James Robertson II ($560), or the two court clerks who ponied up at least $1,000 apiece.
Safire, who entered the race later than Sing and has never run for office before, managed to score occasional contributions in the thousands, including from U.A. Local 38 ($1,000). But the bulk of his cash fundraising came from small-firm or solo attorneys, buttressed by checks from Public Defender Jeff Adachi ($500), a smattering of other lawyers in the PD’s and district attorney’s offices, and various retirees, professors, bail bondsmen and the like. He also managed to get a bigger check than Sing from Deputy Public Defender Daro Inouye, who appears to be the only contributor so far to donate to both races, giving $120 to Sing on April 5, and $200 to Safire on April 11.
— Pam Smith
Leave a comment